APHL Logo
Blog Maternal & Child Health

Born in the USA – Today and 100 Years Ago

In 1915, a newborn baby’s future was uncertain
By Anita Manning

A baby born today in the U.S. is likely to enter a world of clean. Almost all are born in hospitalsi under the care of trained professionals with advanced medical technology at hand. The birth is a prelude to a year of milestones – the first solid food, the first steps, the first birthday celebration.

But it wasn’t always so.

For a baby born just 100 years ago, the first year of life could be highly dangerous. Milk wasn’t always pasteurized and transmitted tuberculosis and other diseases. Hygiene and sanitation weren’t high priorities. Folic acid’s role in preventing neural tube defects wouldn’t be known for another 50 years. Antibiotics were a dream of the future.

About one in ten infants died before their first birthday – far more in some cities and among racial minority groups. Researchers at the time reported that, “in no other period of life do deaths occur with such frequency.’’ii

The change since then – a decline greater than 90% in the rate of infant mortality since 1915 – is “unparalleled by other mortality reduction’’ in the 20th century, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.iii

“During that time, child hygiene was a major issue,’’ says Regina Davis Moss, Ph.D., associate executive director for the American Public Health Association. “Back then, we were not delivering babies in the most hygienic places and we were just discovering how to intervene” when things went wrong. At the turn of the century, fewer than 5% of births occurred in hospitals, and 40% were attended by midwives.iv

USA,Louisiana,New Orleans,Doctor taking woman's pulse

While hand washing was encouraged to reduce the spread of germs, it wasn’t always done, and by the 1920s, “childbed fever,’’ a bacterial infection, was causing up to 40% of maternal deaths.v Babies died of a host of maladies, such as diarrhea and enteritis from poor sewage and dirty drinking water, pneumonia, acute bronchitis and infectious diseases. Incubators initially were a source of fascination and even entertainment at Coney Island and Atlantic City, but few hospitals had them and doctors weren’t sold on them.vi The first Neonatal Intensive Care Unit wouldn’t open until 1960.

Times were grim, especially for the poor and minority communities. “These profound tragedies affected some segments of the population more than others,’’ wrote Charles R. King, M.D., in Children’s Health in America: A History.vii “Most frequently, immigrant and minority children died. For example, twice as many black as white infants died.’’ Desperate poverty and overcrowding in stifling tenements, inadequate medical care and poor nutrition were a recipe for misery.

For babies born with birth defects, there were few medical remedies. One unidentified English woman describes learning as an adult that she had had a brother born in the 1920s with spina bifida, a neural tube defect. In those days, she wrote, “it was often thought best that a very sick or disabled baby was left to die. Or – who knows – even ‘helped’ to die. I think that is what happened with my brother.’’ Her father told her a doctor had advised him to give the baby medicine each night. “The doctor had never explained what the medicine was or what it was for but my dad noticed that each evening after he had the medicine, William was worse. At the end of the week, he died.’’viii

Soon after the start of the new century, public health advocates, responding to the alarmingly high rate of infant deaths, began stepping up their efforts. In 1912, the Children’s Bureau, the first federal agency in the U.S. or the world aimed solely at improving the lives of children and families,ix was established by President Taft. It set out to reduce infant deaths and address other social concerns, but it wasn’t until 1915 that the Bureau of the Census even began tracking the number of births to get a better idea of the scope of the problem. The Birth Registration Area was made up of 10 states and the District of Columbia, with other states following soon after. So, while the true national picture of infant mortality at the time was not clear, the toll in human grief and suffering was apparent.

Parents and baby

The Sheppard-Towner Maternity and Infancy Care Act, passed in 1921 and still considered a landmark in social welfarex, provided federal money to states for prenatal and newborn care programs. Through the next decades the field of obstetrics and gynecology matured, antibiotics and vaccines were developed and advances were made in prenatal care, hygiene and living conditions – and more babies survived that perilous first year of life.

United Health Foundation’s America’s Health Rankings provides an annual state-by-state analysis of factors affecting public health. In its 25th anniversary edition, the report found that infant mortality decreased 4% between 2013 and 2014, from 6.3 to 6.0 deaths per 1,000 live births, the lowest in U.S. history.

But, improvements are not uniform across the country. While infant mortality rates have declined for all demographics, the rate for black infants is more than twice that of white infants, the report says, and the majority of states with high infant mortality rates are in the south. In Mississippi the mortality rate for infants is 9.1, followed by Alabama with 8.6 deaths per 1,000 live births, while Massachusetts’ rate is 4.2 and New Hampshire and Alaska’s 4.5.

“Infant mortality is an indicator of maternal and child health as well as access to quality health care,’’ the America’s Health Rankings report says. The U.S. rate, though lower than ever, is still more than double that of many developed countries. In Japan, Norway, Finland and Sweden, for instance, there are two infant deaths per 1,000 live births.

To bring the infant mortality rate down further, improvements are needed in women’s health before conception, greater access to good prenatal care, and a reduction in elective deliveries before 39 weeks gestation.

“While we celebrate the nation’s significant health gains made over the past 25 years,’’ the report concludes, “we also don’t want to lose sight of the sobering challenges we face. If we want to be in a healthier place 25 years from now, we must all be in this together.’’

UHF_Graphic_02_Final

This article also appears on Vox.com as part of a content partnership celebrating the public health successes of our past and inspiring our continued progress in the future.


i http://iom.nationalacademies.org/Activities/Women/BirthSettings/Birth-Settings-Graphic.aspx?_ga=1.137588338.318771621.144361972 3

ii The Present Position of Infant Mortality: Its Recent Decline in the United States Henry Horace Hibbs, Jr. Publications of the American Statistical Association Vol. 14, No. 112 (Dec., 1915), pp. 813-826 Published by: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. on behalf of the American Statistical Association

iii Achievements in Public Health, 1900-1999: Healthier Mothers and Babies; MMWR Weekly, October 1, 1999/48(38);849-858

iv http://www.midwiferytoday.com/articles/timeline.asp

v Birth: The surprising history of how we are born, Tina Cassidy, 2006 Atlantic Monthly Press

vi http://neonatology.org/pdf/7200377a.pdf

vii https://books.google.com/books/about/Children_s_health_in_America.html?id=r1IQAQAAMAAJ

viii http://anenglishwomanslife.blogspot.com/2010/11/disabled-children-born-in-1920s-my-baby.html

ix History of Maternal and Child Health in the US, October 19, 2012, power point, Peggy West, Ph.D, MSW

x http://history.house.gov/Historical-Highlights/1901-1950/The-Sheppard%E2%80%93Towner-Maternity-and-Infancy-Act/

Share to Facebook Share to Twitter Email to a Friend

RELATED CONTENT